Some news sites are taking steps to address "nasty user comments". I've put that in quotes because the article goes on to give an example of a racist rant, which goes beyond nasty.
Whether it's discontinuing anonymous comments or requiring commenters to register with a credit card, there's now a recognition by these sites that the online behavior cloaked by anonymity has its downside. On the other hand, some say anonymity allows people to share information they otherwise wouldn't. If you'd like, you can go over and leave a comment at the article about your point of view.
And what about when journalists are asked to respond to comments or make comments on social media themselves that can get them fired? What, if any, boundaries should be set to control usage of sites like Twitter and Facebook?
Related: Sophomoric speech is free speech too
Opinions are a risky business in the Twitterverse
Taking the me from social media
Internet afterlife of a killer raises questions of free speech
Whether it's discontinuing anonymous comments or requiring commenters to register with a credit card, there's now a recognition by these sites that the online behavior cloaked by anonymity has its downside. On the other hand, some say anonymity allows people to share information they otherwise wouldn't. If you'd like, you can go over and leave a comment at the article about your point of view.
And what about when journalists are asked to respond to comments or make comments on social media themselves that can get them fired? What, if any, boundaries should be set to control usage of sites like Twitter and Facebook?
Related: Sophomoric speech is free speech too
Opinions are a risky business in the Twitterverse
Taking the me from social media
Internet afterlife of a killer raises questions of free speech